When 'not both' appears in the Result, you:

When 'not both' appears in the Result, you:

• A. Do Not Branch
• B. Branch
• C. Consider alternative outcomes
• D. Validate the result immediately

Answer: (A)

When you see not both, you’re dealing with a mutual exclusion between two possibilities. That means those two outcomes cannot occur together, so there isn’t a need to create a branch that handles both at the same time. Instead, you follow a single, exclusive path depending on which condition actually holds (or recognize that neither holds if that’s possible). Branching would only be necessary if both outcomes could occur simultaneously and you needed to process them separately. The other options describe actions that are not dictated by this exclusivity: considering alternative outcomes would apply when multiple distinct results must be explored, and validating the result immediately is about checking correctness rather than choosing a path.

When you see not both, you’re dealing with a mutual exclusion between two possibilities. That means those two outcomes cannot occur together, so there isn’t a need to create a branch that handles both at the same time. Instead, you follow a single, exclusive path depending on which condition actually holds (or recognize that neither holds if that’s possible). Branching would only be necessary if both outcomes could occur simultaneously and you needed to process them separately. The other options describe actions that are not dictated by this exclusivity: considering alternative outcomes would apply when multiple distinct results must be explored, and validating the result immediately is about checking correctness rather than choosing a path.